Understanding the Difference Between SOC 2 Type 1 And SOC 2 Type 2 Reports

Protecting customers’ data is crucial for any business in today’s cyber-risky digital world. Hence, organizations must ensure compliance with System and Organization Controls (SOC 2) and demonstrate that they follow the best data security practices. Understanding the difference between SOC 2 Type 1 and Type 2 reports and implementing them can help businesses maintain peace of mind while ensuring adequate data protection.

SOC 2 compliance refers to a set of privacy and security standards for service providers designated by the AICPA (American Institute of Certified Public Accountants). Although complying with SOC 2 is not mandatory, customers often demand it from organizations they interact with, especially cloud-based services, to ensure that their data is protected. Organizations looking to meet compliance standards must ensure specific service controls and procedures regarding their information systems’ confidentiality, security, availability, and processing integrity. The systems include the organization’s people, processes, technology, physical infrastructure, and servers.

What is a SOC 2 Report?

To get a SOC 2 report, an organization providing services must undergo a third-party audit. The SOC 2 auditor will be either an American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA) certified firm or a CPA (Certified Public Accountant). They will evaluate your security posture and determine if your controls, policies, and processes comply with the SOC 2 requirements.

The audit reports assess if the service providers undergoing the review have drafted and implemented effective procedures meeting the SOC 2 objectives. Enterprises that successfully pass the SOC 2 audit use the compliance designation to demonstrate that they are committed to the security and privacy of their customers and stakeholders.

SOC 2 is one of the three types of SOC reports. The other two are SOC 1 and SOC 3. A brief description of all three follows:

  • SOC 1 Reports: AICPA mainly developed the SOC 1 framework targeting third-party service providers, which assures your clients that you are handling their financial information safely and securely. SOC1 reports giving your clients an objective evaluation regarding controls addressing compliance, operations, and internal controls over financial reporting.
  • SOC 2 Reports: The SOC 2 framework helps businesses demonstrate their compliance to security controls. After organizations started measuring the effectiveness of their security controls through the SAS 70 audit standard, AICPA developed SOC 2 with an emphasis on security. It is rooted in the Trust Services Criteria or TCS (discussed later). It provides assurance about the internal controls related to TSC and comprehensive information on auditor’s testing in an organization.
  • SOC 3 Reports: The AICPA says that an organization prepares a SOC 3 report to meet the requirements of clients who want assurance regarding the controls related to processing integrity, security, availability, privacy, or confidentiality of a service provider but do not know how to use a SOC 2 report effectively. Thus, SOC 3 contains the same information as SOC 2 but is drafted for a general audience.

Understanding SOC 2 Reports:

  • SOC 2 Type 1: This report focuses on the ‘design’ of an enterprise’s security controls at a specific moment. It describes the existing controls and procedures, reviewing the documents around these controls. Furthermore, it validates the adequacy of all administrative, logical, and technical controls.
  • SOC 2 Type 2: It focuses on the ‘design’ and ‘operating effectiveness’ of controls and takes longer to assess the controls, typically between 3-12 months, and includes the auditor running penetration tests to monitor how the organization handles data security risks over a period. The independent review confirms that the enterprise strictly complies with the requirements outlined by AICPA. The SOC 2 Type 2 audit process includes:
    • Reviewing the audit scope
    • Creating a project plan
    • Testing controls for design and operational effectiveness
    • Authenticating the results
    • Delivering the organization’s report.

Organizations new to compliance can easily confuse SOC 2 Type 1 and Type 2 reports. SOC 2 Type 1 differs from Type 2 in that it assesses the security setup and process design at a specific time. On the other hand, the Type 2 report (also written as “Type II”) estimates how adequate the controls are over a more extended period by observing operations for usually six to 12 months.

Why Would You Need to Comply with SOC 2?

Following are the six reasons why organizations must obtain a SOC 2 compliance report:

  • Cost-effectiveness: Some businesses might think that audit costs are high. However, a SOC 2 audit helps avoid security breaches that are far costlier. For instance, in 2021, a data breach cost more than $4.2 million on average – a figure rising yearly.
  • Competitive advantage: A SOC 2 report will give you an edge over competitors who cannot demonstrate compliance.
  • Peace of mind: Passing the stringent SOC 2 audit assures improved security posture for your networks and information systems.
  • Regulatory compliance: SOC 2’s requirements sync with other frameworks, like the International Organization for Standardization’s ISO 27001 and Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA). Thus, the certification can boost your organization’s overall compliance efforts.
  • Insights: A SOC 2 report gives valuable insights into your business’s risk and security posture, internal controls governance, vendor management, regulatory oversight, and more.

What is Required for SOC 2 Compliance?

You can attract more business with security covered. However, those operating in the finance or banking sector or an industry where confidentiality and privacy are paramount must achieve a higher compliance standard. AICPA defines SOC 2 based on the Trust Services Criteria, which have the following principles:

  • Security: It focuses on operational/governance controls to protect your data and demonstrate that systems at a service organization are protected against unauthorized access and other risks that could impact the service organization’s ability to provide the services promised to clients. All SOC 2 requirements are optional except those that fall under Security. Selecting additional SOC 2 principles may vary based on the type of data you store or process,
  • Availability: It focuses on the accessibility of the system and how you maintain and monitor your infrastructure, data, and software to ensure you have the system components and processing capacity to meet your business objectives.

SOC 2 compliance requirements in the ‘Availability’ category include:

  1. Measuring current usage: Establishing a capacity management baseline to evaluate the risk of availability caused by capacity constraints.
  2. Identifying environmental threats: Assessing ecological threats that can impact system availability, like adverse weather, power cuts, fire, or failure of environmental control systems.
  • Processing integrity: It focuses on delivering the correct data at the right time and place. Furthermore, data processing must be accurate, valid, and authorized.

SOC 2 compliance requirements in the ‘Processing integrity’ category include:

  1. Creating and maintaining records for system inputs: Compiling accurate records of all the system input activities.
  2. Defining processing activities: This ensures that the products or services meet specifications.
  • Confidentiality: It restricts disclosure of and access to private data so that only specific, authorized organizations or people can view it. Confidential data can include business plans, sensitive financial information, customer data, or intellectual property.

SOC 2 compliance requirements in the ‘Confidentiality’ category include:

  1. Identifying confidential information: Implementing procedures to identify personal and sensitive information when you create or receive it and determine how long you must retain it.
  2. Destroying confidential information: Implementing procedures to erase sensitive information identified and marked for destruction.
  • Privacy: It focuses on the organization’s adherence to the client’s privacy safeguards and AICPA’s generally accepted privacy principles (GAPP). The SOC category considers methods for collecting, using, and retaining personal information and the process for the disposal and disclosure of data.

SOC 2 compliance requirements in the ‘Privacy’ category include:

  1. Using clear and conspicuous language: The organization’s privacy notice must be clear and coherent, leaving no chance for misinterpretation.
  2. Collecting information from reliable sources: The organization confirms third-party data sources are trustworthy and operates its data collection process legally and fairly.

Additional SOC 2 Compliance Checklist

SOC 2 compliance bases itself on the five Trust Services Categories: availability, processing integrity, confidentiality, privacy, and security. Security forms the SOC 2 compliance baseline and includes broad criteria familiar to all trust service categories.

The security principle focuses on the service’s asset and data protection against unauthorized access or use. Organizations can implement access controls to prevent unauthorized data removal, malicious attacks, misuse of the organization’s software, or unsanctioned disclosure of organizational information.

The essential SOC 2 compliance checklist (that will satisfy the auditor) should address these controls:

  • Physical and logical access controls: How the organization restricts and manages physical and logical access to prevent unauthorized access.
  • System operations: How the organization manages its system operations to detect and prevent deviations from set procedures.
  • Change management: How the organization implements a controlled change management process and mitigates unauthorized changes.
  • Risk management: How the organization identifies and develops risk mitigation activities while navigating business disruptions and using vendor services.

Does Law Require SOC 2 Certification?

Generally, you do not need SOC 2 compliance certification legally. However, most Software-as-a-system (SaaS) and business-to-business (B2B) vendors should consider getting certified if they haven’t already because SOC 2 is a crucial requirement in vendor contracts.

Can You Use Software to Speed Up SOC 2 Compliance?

As mentioned, SOC 2 primarily revolves around policies and processes and is concerned little about technical tasks. Hence, there is no dedicated, automated tool that will quickly make your business SOC 2 compliant.

Furthermore, the SOC 2 requirements are not prescriptive; hence you must define your processes and controls for SOC 2 compliance and then use automated tools to make their implementation easy. Thus, a system will monitor and alert you whenever a technical control failure occurs. For example, suppose one of the limits of your control offers access to your systems to specific administrators. You can deploy a tool that tracks and retrieves the status of permissions in real time.

For every implemented control, think of the evidence you will present to the auditor. You must remember that defining a rule is merely a part of the SOC 2 compliance requirements; you must demonstrate that it works effectively. 

SOC 2 Vs. SOC 1: How To Determine if the SOC 2 Audit is for You?

CPAs may choose to go for either a SOC 1 or SOC 2 compliance audit. You must comply with SOC 2 Type 2 if you store customer data. To determine if you require a SOC 2 audit, you must start by knowing how SOC 2 differs from SOC 1.

  • SOC 1: SOC 1 compliance considers controls relevant to an organization’s internal control over financial reporting. The reports can be either Type 1 or Type 2. The Type 1 report signifies that the enterprise suitably defines and implements the rules in operation. The Type 2 report would offer these assurances, including an opinion if the controls were adequate throughout an extended period.
  • SOC 2: SOC 2 compliance is voluntary for service organizations who wish to demonstrate their commitment to information security. Same as above, SOC 2 reports are also of two types.

Your organization must pursue SOC 1 if your services affect your clients’ financial reporting. For example, if your enterprise creates software processing your clients’ collections and billing data, you are impacting their financial reporting, and hence a SOC 1 is appropriate. Another reason enterprises prefer SOC 1 is that their clients demand a “right to audit.” Without SOC 1, it can be a time-intensive and costly process for both parties, especially if a few of your clients ask to submit a similar request. Additionally, you must comply with SOC 1 as a compliance requirement.

On the other hand, no compliance framework like HIPAA or PCI-DSS requires you to be SOC 2 compliant. In other words, if your business does not process financial data but only hosts or processes other data types, you require the SOC 2 report. With today’s business environment becoming extraordinarily aware and sensitive regarding data breaches, your clients will want proof that you are taking adequate precautions to protect their data and prevent any leaks.

Thus, the choice to pursue either SOC 1 or SOC 2 certification depends on your organization’s operational profile. A critical determining factor when choosing between SOC 1 and SOC 2 is your organization’s controls affecting your client’s control over financial reporting. You can engage an audit firm to determine whether SOC 1 or SOC 2 certification (or both) is the right fit for your enterprise.

A thorough understanding of the difference between SOC 2 Type 1 and SOC 2 Type 2 reports will help service providers handle their customers’ data with appropriate security. They must consider investing in the technical audit necessary for a SOC 2 report to protect their clients’ non-financial yet confidential and sensitive data. Many clients today expect SOC 2 compliance from their service providers, and if you are SOC 2 compliant, it demonstrates your dedication to cybersecurity.

About Columbia Advisory Group:
Columbia Advisory Group (CAG) is a leading Information Technology (IT) consulting firm. CAG’s team has assessed and helped improve the performance of more than 300 technology organizations and IT departments, including many higher education institutions, state agencies, and Fortune 50 customers. Practice specialty areas include Infrastructure, IT Service Management, Cybersecurity, and A/V Services. CAG improves business outcomes with IT insights and expert technical support. Based in Dallas, Texas, CAG works extensively with clients throughout the U.S. Contact us at .

References

  1. Brown, S. (2022, October 11). SOC 2 Type 1 guide: Everything you need to know. Retrieved January 1, 2023, from Strongdm.com website: https://www.strongdm.com/blog/what-is-soc-2-type-1
  2. Harrington, D. (2022, August 26). SOC 2 compliance definition & checklist. Retrieved January 1, 2023, from Varonis.com website: https://www.varonis.com/blog/soc-2-compliance
  3. Johnson, B. (2022, September 30). The Differences Between SOC 1 vs SOC 2. Retrieved January 1, 2023, from Strongdm.com website: https://www.strongdm.com/blog/soc-1-vs-soc-2
  4. Picotte, A. (2020, May 5). SOC 2 compliance requirements: Essential knowledge for security audits. Retrieved January 1, 2023, from Uptycs.com website: https://www.uptycs.com/blog/soc-2-compliance-requirements
  5. SOC 2 compliance requirements. (n.d.). Retrieved January 1, 2023, from Secureframe website: https://secureframe.com/hub/soc-2/requirements
  6. SOC 2 Type II: Compliance and certification. (n.d.). Retrieved January 1, 2023, from Getkisi.com website: https://www.getkisi.com/guides/soc-2-type-ii

Reciprocity. (2022, November 9). 6 Reasons Why You Need SOC 2 Compliance. Retrieved January 1, 2023, from Reciprocity.com website: https://reciprocity.com/blog/6-reasons-why-you-need-soc-2-compliance/

Lori Demello

Director, Compliance and Risk Management

Maximizing Efficiency and Success: The Benefits of Outsourcing IT Project Management

Outsourcing project management can bring numerous benefits to a company, including reduced cost, reduced time to market, and staying true to the objectives, reduced scope creep. Here are some key reasons why outsourcing project management can be a good idea:

  1. Expertise and specialization: One of the main advantages of outsourcing project management is that it allows companies to tap into specialized expertise and knowledge. Outsourcing firms typically have a team of experienced project managers who have a deep understanding of various industries and sectors. This can be particularly useful for companies working on complex projects that require specialized skills and knowledge.
  2. Cost savings: Outsourcing project management can help companies save a significant amount of money. By outsourcing project management, companies can avoid the cost of hiring, training, and managing a team of in-house project managers. This can be especially beneficial for small and medium-sized businesses that may not have the resources to hire and manage a full-time project management team.
  3. Improved efficiency: Outsourcing project management can also improve efficiency as it allows companies to focus on their core business activities. By outsourcing project management, companies can free up time and resources that can be better utilized in other areas of the business. In addition, outsourcing firms typically have systems and processes in place to ensure that projects are completed on time and within budget, which can help to reduce the risk of delays and cost overruns.
  4. Access to technology and tools: Outsourcing project management can also give companies access to the latest technology and tools, which can help to improve project efficiency and effectiveness. Many outsourcing firms invest in the latest project management software and tools, which can benefit companies that may not have the budget to invest in these tools themselves.
  5. Flexibility: Outsourcing project management can also provide companies with greater flexibility. By outsourcing project management, companies can scale up or down their project management resources as needed, depending on the demands of the business. This can be particularly useful for companies that experience fluctuations in project demand or have unpredictable project schedules.
  6. Improved quality: Outsourcing project management can also lead to improved project quality. Outsourcing firms typically have strict quality standards and processes to ensure that projects are completed to the highest standards. This can be especially beneficial for companies working on projects that require a high level of precision and attention to detail.

In conclusion, outsourcing project management can bring numerous benefits to a company, including access to specialized expertise and knowledge, cost savings, improved efficiency, technology and tools, flexibility, and improved quality. By outsourcing project management, companies can focus on their core business activities while leveraging the expertise of the outsourced project management team to deliver projects that further enhances their business outcomes.

About Columbia Advisory Group:
Columbia Advisory Group (CAG) is a leading Information Technology (IT) consulting firm. CAG’s team has assessed and helped improve the performance of more than 300 technology organizations and IT departments, including many higher education institutions, state agencies, and Fortune 50 customers. Practice specialty areas include Infrastructure, IT Service Management, Cybersecurity, and A/V Services. CAG improves business outcomes with IT insights and expert technical support. Based in Dallas, Texas, CAG works extensively with clients throughout the U.S. Contact us at .

Picture of Claude Bird

Claude Bird

Director, Project Management

Why Purchasing with E&I Cooperative Services is a good idea for Higher Education

Purchasing via E&I Cooperative Services (E&I) benefits for higher education institutions for a number of reasons:

  • Cost savings: E&I is the only non-profit procurement cooperative exclusively focused on education. E&I helps its member institutions save money on their purchases by negotiating discounted prices and streamlined procurement processes with best-in-class providers by purchasing via E&I’s contracts, higher education institutions can take advantage of these cost savings, which can help them stretch their budgets and allocate more resources to other priorities, such as student success.
  • Streamlined procurement: Higher education institutions that partner with E&I can benefit from the organization’s competitively awarded procurement processes, which can help them save time and reduce administrative burden on busy procurement departments, acting as an extension of that department. By leveraging these services, higher education institutions can focus on their core mission of educating students rather than managing an additional procurement process.
  • Access to a wide range of products and services: E&I has a wide range of products and services available to its member institutions, including everything from office supplies and furniture to IT and facilities management. By partnering with E&I, higher education institutions can access these products and services at discounted prices, helping them save money and improve their operations.
  • Expertise and support: Higher education institutions that partner with E&I benefit from the organization’s expertise and support in procurement, supply chain management, and sustainability. Training and support for procurement professionals, guidance on sustainability initiatives, strategic spend assessments, and access to best practices and case studies.
  • Networking and collaboration: Higher education institutions that partner with E&I can benefit from the opportunity to network and collaborate with other institutions and organizations that are also focused on cost savings and efficiency. E&I members share best practices, learn from others’ experiences, and work together to solve common challenges.

Overall, partnering with E&I can provide higher education institutions with expedited access to supplier contracts that save money and streamline procurement processes. By leveraging the organization’s expertise and resources, higher education institutions can improve their operations and allocate more resources to their core mission of educating students.

About Columbia Advisory Group:
Columbia Advisory Group (CAG) is a leading Information Technology (IT) consulting firm. CAG’s team has assessed and helped improve the performance of more than 300 technology organizations and IT departments, including many higher education institutions, state agencies, and Fortune 50 customers. Practice specialty areas include Infrastructure, IT Service Management, Cybersecurity, and A/V Services. CAG improves business outcomes with IT insights and expert technical support. Based in Dallas, Texas, CAG works extensively with clients throughout the U.S. Contact us at .

Picture of Haley Rose

Haley Rose

Chief Marketing Officer

Ellucian Banner Labor Market Shortages

The shortage of Ellucian Banner labor is a growing concern for many educational institutions. Ellucian Banner is a comprehensive enterprise resource planning (ERP) system used by colleges and universities to manage a wide range of functions, including student information, financial aid, human resources, and more. As such, it is a critical component of the daily operations of these institutions.

However, finding qualified professionals to work with Ellucian Banner can be challenging. Several factors contribute to this shortage, including the complexity of the system and the lack of training programs available.

One of the main reasons for the shortage of Ellucian Banner labor is the system’s complexity. Ellucian Banner is a powerful tool that can handle a wide range of functions, but it also requires a high level of expertise to set up and maintain. This complexity can make it difficult for institutions to find qualified professionals who are familiar with the system and can effectively implement and support it.

Another factor contributing to the shortage of Ellucian Banner labor is the lack of training programs available. Many colleges and universities do not have the resources to provide in-house training for their staff, which can make it difficult for employees to learn the system. This can lead to a lack of qualified professionals who are familiar with Ellucian Banner and can effectively use it to support the institution.

A limited number of certified professionals are also trained in Ellucian Banner. This can make it difficult for institutions to find qualified professionals to fill open positions. Additionally, the demand for Ellucian Banner professionals is high, which can lead to competition for qualified candidates and drive up salaries.

The shortage of Ellucian Banner labor has serious consequences for educational institutions. Without qualified professionals to manage and maintain the system, institutions may struggle to effectively support students and staff, leading to a decline in service and satisfaction. This can also have a negative impact on the institution’s reputation and bottom line.

To address the shortage of Ellucian Banner labor, institutions can take a number of steps. One option is to invest in training programs to help current staff learn the system. This can be an effective way to build in-house expertise and reduce the need for outside professionals.

Another option is to partner with a third-party provider that can offer Ellucian Banner support and maintenance services. This can be a cost-effective way to ensure that the system runs smoothly and efficiently without hiring additional staff.

In conclusion, the shortage of Ellucian Banner labor is a growing concern for many educational institutions. The complexity of the system and the lack of training programs are contributing factors to this shortage. To address this issue, institutions can invest in training programs or partner with third-party providers to ensure they have the expertise they need to support students and staff effectively.

About Columbia Advisory Group:
Columbia Advisory Group (CAG) is a leading Information Technology (IT) consulting firm. CAG’s team has assessed and helped improve the performance of more than 300 technology organizations and IT departments, including many higher education institutions, state agencies, and Fortune 50 customers. Practice specialty areas include Infrastructure, IT Service Management, Cybersecurity, and A/V Services. CAG improves business outcomes with IT insights and expert technical support. Based in Dallas, Texas, CAG works extensively with clients throughout the U.S. Contact us at .

Picture of Clay Gollier

Clay Gollier

SIS Practice Leader

Microsoft Patch Tuesday: Two zero-day flaws in Windows need immediate attention

Microsoft’s December Patch Tuesday update delivers 59 fixes, including two zero-days (CVE-2022-44698 and CVE-2022-44710) that require immediate attention on the Windows platform. This is a network-focused update (TCP/IP and RDP) that will require significant testing with an emphasis on ODBC connections, Hyper-V systems, Kerberos authentication, and printing (both local and remote).   Microsoft also published an urgent out-of-band update (CVE-2022-37966) to address serious Kerberos authentication issues. 

Known issues

  • ODBC: After installing the December update, applications that use ODBC connections through Microsoft ODBC SQL Server Driver (sqlsrv32.dll) to access databases might not connect. You might receive the following error messages: “The EMS System encountered a problem. Message: [Microsoft] [ODBC SQL Server Driver] Unknown token received from SQL Server”.
  • RDP and Remote Access: After you install this or later updates on Windows desktop systems, you might be unable to reconnect to (Microsoft) Direct Access after temporarily losing network connectivity or transitioning between Wi-Fi networks or access points.
  • Hyper-V: After installing this update on Hyper-V hosts managed by SDN-configured System Center Virtual Machine Manager (VMM), you might receive an error on workflows involving creating a new Network Adapter (also called a Network Interface Card or NIC) joined to a VM network or a new Virtual Machine (VM).
  • Active Directory: Due to additional security requirements in addressing the security vulnerabilities in CVE-2022-38042, new security checks are implemented on domain net join requests. These extra checks may generate the following error message: “Error 0xaac (2732): NERR_AccountReuseBlockedByPolicy: An account with the same name exists in Active Directory. Re-using the account was blocked by a security policy.”

About Columbia Advisory Group:
Columbia Advisory Group (CAG) is a leading Information Technology (IT) consulting firm. CAG’s team has assessed and helped improve the performance of more than 300 technology organizations and IT departments, including many higher education institutions, state agencies, and Fortune 50 customers. Practice specialty areas include Infrastructure, IT Service Management, Cybersecurity, and A/V Services. CAG improves business outcomes with IT insights and expert technical support. Based in Dallas, Texas, CAG works extensively with clients throughout the U.S. Contact us at .

Picture of Brad Hudson

Brad Hudson

VP of Cyber Security | vCISO
CISSP,CCSP,CCNP,MCSA,MCITP:EA,SA

Columbia Advisory Group Expands Availability of its Services via TIPS-USA Contract

IT issues are mission-critical, and we are glad to be able to help our education, municipal, county and state agency clients to respond to increased IT needs and tightening budgets.

DALLAS, TEXAS, UNITED STATES, August 29, 2022/EINPresswire.com/ — Columbia Advisory Group (CAG), the leading IT managed services and cybersecurity provider to public and private sector organizations, today announced the availability of its industry-leading services on The Interlocal Purchasing System (TIPS-USA).

The TIPS Program evolved to help streamline the procurement process and expedite purchases. As a co-op, both awarded technology vendors and public sector members – which include K-12 and private schools, colleges, universities, cities, counties, non-profits, and other government entities – can accelerate business transactions by requirements up-front.

Leveraging the TIPS-USA contract, higher-education and other government buyers can realize significant cost savings by reducing the overall time and expense of a cumbersome bid process. Because TIPS provides access to high-performance vendors, agencies can also achieve quick and efficient delivery of goods and services, particularly when it comes to cybersecurity and other IT services. In addition, TIPS provides access to state-of-the-art purchasing procedures to provide competitive contracts, bulk purchasing, and other efficiencies. For these reasons, TIPS has become a preferred purchasing vehicle for state and local entities.

The Interlocal Purchasing System currently serves entities such as state and local governments and non-profit organizations, including but not limited to K-12 school districts, Charter Schools, Colleges and Universities (State and Private), Cities/Municipalities, Counties/Parishes, State Agencies, Emergency Services Districts and Non-profit organizations as defined by the Internal Revenue Service, as well as many other entities with legislated purchasing/bidding requirements. TIPS-USA membership is free.

Now, with the addition of the CAG the TIPS-USA contract, members can realize digital transformation with a best-in-class IT services firm designed for public sector frameworks. CAG is trusted by multiple higher-education, government institutions, state agencies and school districts to manage their IT environments via cybersecurity services, digital optimization, and IT innovation.

“Our public sector clients appreciate the ability to secure our services via vetted contracts like that of TIPS-USA,” explains David McLaughlin, President and CEO of Columbia Advisory Group. “TIPS-USA will help our clients to move swiftly when they discover a need within their organization for our IT expertise. In today’s business age, IT issues are mission-critical, and we are glad to be able to help our education, municipal, county and state agency clients to respond to twin dynamics of increased IT needs and tightening budgets.”

For more than 10 years, CAG has helped leading public agencies to improve their cybersecurity postures and to improve their IT environment through managed service. CAG provides access to specialized practice teams, including cybersecurity, application support, IT governance, IT due diligence, project management, IT infrastructure and comprehensive audio-visual services.

To learn more about purchasing from CAG on the TIPS-USA contract, contact CAG.
About Columbia Advisory Group:
Columbia Advisory Group (CAG) is a leading Information Technology (IT) consulting firm. CAG’s team has assessed and helped improve the performance of more than 300 technology organizations and IT departments, including many institutions of higher education, state agencies, and Fortune 50 customers. Practice specialty areas include Infrastructure, IT Service Management, Cybersecurity and A/V Services. CAG improves business outcomes with IT insights and expert technology support. Based in Dallas, Texas, CAG works extensively with clients throughout the U.S. For more information, visit www.columbiaadvisory.com.

Columbia Advisory Group Adds Extended Detection and Response to IT Managed Service Portfolio with Abacode Partnership

"In this time of increasing global attacks, it is critical to have around-the-clock eyes on the network.”

DALLAS, TEXAS, UNITED STATES, June 13, 2022 /EINPresswire.com/ — Dallas-based Columbia Advisory Group (CAG), a leading provider of IT Managed and Cybersecurity Services, today announced the expansion of its services via a partnership with Abacode, a leading provider of managed Extended Detection and Response (XDR).

The partnership between CAG and Abacode will allow clients to one-stop-shop for specialized IT Managed Services, Governance, Risk Management, and Compliance (GRC), Virtual CISO services and managed XDR services to analyze data breaches as they occur.

As organizations face increasing threats of ransomware, data breach, and phishing, they must simultaneously upgrade their governance and compliance activities to minimize risk while simultaneously detecting and responding to breaches as they arise to understand, contain and prevent them. This capability requires increasingly scarce competent cybersecurity leadership and specialized, virtual Security Operations Center (vSOC) services that can investigate problems in real-time and provide visibility across the enterprise of controls compliance.

“Our many public-sector, educational, manufacturing, and health care clients already rely upon CAG for cybersecurity guidance and IT expertise. CAG is pleased to bolster our leading Cybersecurity practice by offering 24x7x365 SOC 2 Type 1 and 2 XDR services via our partner, Abacode. In this time of increasing global attacks, it is critical to have around-the-clock eyes on the network,” said David McLaughlin, President and CEO of Columbia Advisory Group.

“Abacode is constantly striving to push the technology industry forward by partnering with top-notch leaders in the MSP space,” said Greg Chevalier, Senior Vice President – Partners and Sales Strategy for Abacode. “Partnering with Columbia Advisory Group ensures that clients not only have their information technology operations humming along at peak efficiency with their managed services but now includes Abacode’s Managed Detection and Response and Security Operations Center support.”

About Columbia Advisory Group:

Columbia Advisory Group (CAG) is a well-respected Information Technology (IT) consulting firm. CAG’s team has assessed and helped improve the performance of more than 300 technology organizations and IT departments, including many institutions of higher education, state agencies, and Fortune 500 customers. By focusing on practical solutions and straightforward analysis, CAG’s team supports many regulatory and economic environments and organizations of all sizes. Practice specialty areas include Cybersecurity, Infrastructure, IT Service Management, Application Management and A/V Services. Whether a client is high-growth or economically challenged, CAG can improve business outcomes with IT insight and support. Based in Dallas, Texas, CAG works extensively with clients throughout the U.S. For more information, visit www.columbiaadvisory.com.

About Abacode

Abacode combines leading technologies and professional services to implement Cybersecurity and Compliance programs for clients throughout the world. Abacode enables clients to implement a Cyber Capability Maturity Model and benefit from our expert Extended Detection and Response capabilities. Offices in the Americas and Europe. Learn more at Abacode.com or connect with us at insight@abacode.com